Skip to main content

How to Avoid the Correlation-Causation Fallacy in Finance: A Quick Guide

 


# Correlation Does Not Imply Causation: A One Minute Perspective on Correlation vs. Causation


If you are interested in finance, you have probably encountered many graphs, charts, and statistics that show the relationship between two variables. For example, you might see a graph that shows how the stock market performance is correlated with the unemployment rate, or how the inflation rate is correlated with the consumer price index. But what do these correlations mean? And can we use them to make predictions or draw conclusions about the causes of financial phenomena?


## What is correlation?


Correlation is a measure of how closely two variables move together. It ranges from -1 to 1, where -1 means that the variables move in opposite directions, 0 means that there is no relationship, and 1 means that the variables move in the same direction. For example, if the correlation between the stock market and the unemployment rate is -0.8, it means that when the stock market goes up, the unemployment rate tends to go down, and vice versa.


## What is causation?


Causation is a stronger concept than correlation. It means that one variable directly affects or influences another variable. For example, if smoking causes lung cancer, it means that smoking increases the risk of developing lung cancer. Causation implies correlation, but not the other way around. That is, if A causes B, then A and B must be correlated, but if A and B are correlated, it does not mean that A causes B.


## Why does correlation not imply causation?


There are many reasons why correlation does not imply causation. Here are some of the most common ones:


- **Third variable problem**: Sometimes, two variables are correlated because they are both influenced by a third variable that is not accounted for. For example, ice cream sales and shark attacks are correlated, but not because ice cream causes shark attacks or vice versa. They are both influenced by the temperature, which affects people's behavior and the activity of sharks.

- **Directionality problem**: Sometimes, two variables are correlated, but it is not clear which one causes the other, or if they cause each other. For example, education and income are correlated, but does education cause income, or does income cause education, or do they both affect each other?

- **Spurious correlation**: Sometimes, two variables are correlated by chance or due to some hidden factor that is not relevant to the analysis. For example, the number of people who drowned in pools and the number of films that Nicolas Cage appeared in are correlated, but this is most likely a coincidence or due to some other factor that has nothing to do with either variable.


## How can we determine causation?


Determining causation is not easy, and often requires more than just looking at correlations. Some of the methods that can help us establish causation are:


- **Experimental design**: The best way to determine causation is to conduct a controlled experiment, where we manipulate one variable and observe the effect on another variable, while holding everything else constant. For example, to test if smoking causes lung cancer, we can randomly assign some people to smoke and some people to not smoke, and compare their lung cancer rates after some time.

- **Statistical tests**: There are some statistical tests that can help us infer causation from correlation, such as the Granger causality test or the instrumental variable method. These tests rely on some assumptions and conditions that must be met, and they can only provide evidence, not proof, of causation.

- **Causal criteria**: There are some criteria that can help us evaluate the plausibility of causation, such as the Bradford Hill criteria or the counterfactual approach. These criteria include factors such as the strength, consistency, specificity, temporality, coherence, and mechanism of the causal relationship.


## Conclusion


Correlation and causation are two related but different concepts that are often confused or misinterpreted in finance and other fields. Correlation is a measure of how closely two variables move together, while causation is a stronger concept that means that one variable directly affects or influences another variable. Correlation does not imply causation, because there may be other factors that explain the relationship between two variables, such as a third variable, a reverse direction, or a spurious correlation. To determine causation, we need to use more rigorous methods, such as experimental design, statistical tests, or causal criteria. By understanding the difference between correlation and causation, we can avoid making false or misleading claims or predictions based on correlations, and instead use them as a starting point for further investigation and analysis.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trade Unions 101: What They Are, Why They Matter, and How They Wor

  The history of trade unions is a long and complex one, involving social, economic, and political factors. Here is a brief summary of some key events and developments: Trade unions originated in Great Britain, continental Europe, and the United States during the Industrial Revolution, when workers faced harsh and exploitative conditions in factories and mines 1 . Trade unions were initially illegal and persecuted by employers and governments, who used laws such as restraint-of-trade and conspiracy to suppress their activities 1 . Trade unions gradually gained legal recognition and protection through acts such as the Trade-Union Act of 1871 in Britain 1 and a series of court decisions in the United States 2 . Trade unions adopted different strategies and structures depending on the country, industry, and sector they operated in. Some examples are craft unions, general unions, and industrial unions 1 2 . Trade unions also developed political affiliations and influences, such as the...

The Zero-Based Budgeting Method: How to Make Every Dollar Count

Hey friends! Are you tired of living paycheck to paycheck and never being able to save any money? It's a common problem, but there's a solution. Enter the zero-based budgeting method. Zero-based budgeting is a budgeting system where you start with zero dollars in your budget and then allocate every dollar to a specific category, whether it be savings, housing, or entertainment. The idea is that at the end of the month, your income minus your expenses should equal zero. Sounds simple, right? Well, the trick is sticking to it. But with a little discipline and effort, zero-based budgeting can be a game-changer for your finances. So, how do you get started with zero-based budgeting? Here's a step-by-step guide: Write down all of your monthly income, including your salary, any side hustle income, and any other sources of income. Write down all of your monthly expenses, including everything from rent and utilities to groceries and entertainment. Make sure to include all of your f...

How to Avoid Buying a Lemon: What George Akerlof Taught Us About Information Asymmetry and Market Failures

How the Market for Lemons Explains Why We Can’t Have Nice Things Have you ever wondered why it is so hard to find a good used car, or a reliable contractor, or a trustworthy insurance company? You might think that the market would reward the sellers of high-quality products and services, and weed out the low-quality ones. But sometimes, the opposite happens: the market becomes flooded with “lemons”, or defective goods, and the good ones disappear. This is what Nobel laureate George Akerlof called the “market for lemons” problem, and it has profound implications for many aspects of our economy and society. What is the market for lemons? The market for lemons is a situation where there is asymmetric information between buyers and sellers, meaning that one party has more or better information than the other. In particular, the seller knows more about the quality of the product or service than the buyer, and the buyer cannot easily verify it before making a purchase. This creates a problem...