Skip to main content

Profiteering, Price Fixing and Price Gouging: What They Mean and How They Affect You


Profiteering, Price Fixing and Price Gouging Defined, Explained and Compared

Have you ever wondered why some products or services become so expensive during a crisis or an emergency? Or why some companies seem to collude with each other to keep prices high and limit competition? Or why some sellers charge outrageous prices for essential goods that people need to survive?

If you have, then you may have encountered some examples of profiteering, price fixing and price gouging. These are three terms that describe different ways of manipulating prices to make unfair or excessive profits. In this blog post, we will define, explain and compare these three concepts and how they affect consumers and markets.

What is Profiteering?

Profiteering is the act of making a large or unfair profit by sketchy means. An example of profiteering is pay-day loans, which typically come with exorbitant interest rates that make them difficult to pay back. The company offering the loan then makes an unfair profit because of their inflated interest rates1

Profiteering is similar to price gouging, but it can be distinguished by being long-term and widespread and by involving non-essential goods or services. For example, profiteering can occur when companies hoard goods during an emergency to resell them at exorbitant prices later. An example is the New York sporting goods retailer who bought more than 5.6 tons of masks, surgical gowns, hand sanitizer, gloves, and other critical supplies in March and April 2020 to sell in a dedicated section of his store2

Profiteering is not technically illegal unless it involves committing a crime. However, it is often considered unethical and immoral, as it exploits people’s needs and vulnerabilities.

What is Price Fixing?

Price fixing is the act of agreeing with competitors to set a minimum or maximum price for their products or services. For example, electronics retail companies may collectively fix the price of televisions by setting a price premium or discount3

Price fixing is a way of controlling supply and demand. With price fixing, companies agree to fix their prices to maintain their hold on the market. In other words, different companies may price their products at the same high price so that people have no choice but to buy it at that price, and then everyone selling that product makes a greater profit.

Price fixing is illegal in many countries, as it violates antitrust or competition laws. Price fixing is considered anti-competitive and harmful to consumers and markets, as it reduces choice, quality and innovation.

What is Price Gouging?

Price gouging is the act of raising the prices of goods or services to a level much higher than is considered reasonable or fair. Usually, this event occurs after a demand or supply shock. This commonly applies to price increases of basic necessities after natural disasters4

Price gouging is a form of exploitation of supply and demand. Price gouging occurs when sellers take advantage of a temporary situation of scarcity or urgency to charge excessively high prices for goods or services that people need to survive or cope. For example, price gouging can occur when gas stations increase their prices when there is a gas shortage in the area3

Price gouging is illegal in many countries, especially during a state of emergency or disaster. Price gouging laws vary by jurisdiction, but they usually define price gouging as selling a product above a certain percentage of its average price in the past 30 days. Price gouging is considered unethical and immoral, as it harms consumers and society.

How to Compare Profiteering, Price Fixing and Price Gouging?

Profiteering, price fixing and price gouging are three different ways of manipulating prices to make unfair or excessive profits. However, they have some similarities and differences that can be compared as follows:

  • Similarities: All three concepts involve charging higher prices than the market value or the cost of production. All three concepts are often considered unethical and immoral, as they exploit consumers and harm markets. All three concepts can occur in any industry or sector, depending on the circumstances and opportunities.
  • Differences: Profiteering is a general term that can apply to any sketchy means of making a large or unfair profit, while price fixing and price gouging are more specific terms that refer to particular methods of manipulating prices. Profiteering can involve non-essential goods or services, while price fixing and price gouging usually involve essential goods or services. Profiteering can be long-term and widespread, while price fixing and price gouging are usually short-term and localized. Profiteering is not always illegal, while price fixing and price gouging are often illegal.

Conclusion

Profiteering, price fixing and price gouging are three concepts that describe different ways of manipulating prices to make unfair or excessive profits. They have some similarities and differences that can be compared and contrasted. As consumers, we should be aware of these concepts and how they affect us and the markets. As citizens, we should support laws and regulations that prevent or punish these practices and protect our rights and interests.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Trade Unions 101: What They Are, Why They Matter, and How They Wor

  The history of trade unions is a long and complex one, involving social, economic, and political factors. Here is a brief summary of some key events and developments: Trade unions originated in Great Britain, continental Europe, and the United States during the Industrial Revolution, when workers faced harsh and exploitative conditions in factories and mines 1 . Trade unions were initially illegal and persecuted by employers and governments, who used laws such as restraint-of-trade and conspiracy to suppress their activities 1 . Trade unions gradually gained legal recognition and protection through acts such as the Trade-Union Act of 1871 in Britain 1 and a series of court decisions in the United States 2 . Trade unions adopted different strategies and structures depending on the country, industry, and sector they operated in. Some examples are craft unions, general unions, and industrial unions 1 2 . Trade unions also developed political affiliations and influences, such as the...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Zero-Based Budgeting Method: How to Make Every Dollar Count

Hey friends! Are you tired of living paycheck to paycheck and never being able to save any money? It's a common problem, but there's a solution. Enter the zero-based budgeting method. Zero-based budgeting is a budgeting system where you start with zero dollars in your budget and then allocate every dollar to a specific category, whether it be savings, housing, or entertainment. The idea is that at the end of the month, your income minus your expenses should equal zero. Sounds simple, right? Well, the trick is sticking to it. But with a little discipline and effort, zero-based budgeting can be a game-changer for your finances. So, how do you get started with zero-based budgeting? Here's a step-by-step guide: Write down all of your monthly income, including your salary, any side hustle income, and any other sources of income. Write down all of your monthly expenses, including everything from rent and utilities to groceries and entertainment. Make sure to include all of your f...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Avoid Buying a Lemon: What George Akerlof Taught Us About Information Asymmetry and Market Failures

How the Market for Lemons Explains Why We Can’t Have Nice Things Have you ever wondered why it is so hard to find a good used car, or a reliable contractor, or a trustworthy insurance company? You might think that the market would reward the sellers of high-quality products and services, and weed out the low-quality ones. But sometimes, the opposite happens: the market becomes flooded with “lemons”, or defective goods, and the good ones disappear. This is what Nobel laureate George Akerlof called the “market for lemons” problem, and it has profound implications for many aspects of our economy and society. What is the market for lemons? The market for lemons is a situation where there is asymmetric information between buyers and sellers, meaning that one party has more or better information than the other. In particular, the seller knows more about the quality of the product or service than the buyer, and the buyer cannot easily verify it before making a purchase. This creates a problem...
Post a Comment
Read more