Skip to main content

How the Big Three Credit Rating Agencies Affect Your Finances (And What You Can Do About It)



The “Big Three” Credit Rating Agencies in One Minute: Standard & Poor’s/S&P, Moody’s and Fitch Group

If you are an investor, a borrower, or a financial enthusiast, you have probably heard of the “Big Three” credit rating agencies. These are the companies that assess the creditworthiness and financial stability of various entities, such as governments, corporations, and financial institutions. They assign ratings to the debts issued by these entities, indicating the likelihood of default or repayment. The ratings can influence the interest rates, borrowing costs, and investment decisions of millions of people around the world.

But who are these “Big Three” credit rating agencies, and how did they become so influential?

The “Big Three” are S&P Global Ratings (S&P), Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s), and Fitch Ratings (Fitch). They are all based in the United States, except for Fitch, which is dual-headquartered in New York and London. Together, they control about 95% of the global rating market, with S&P and Moody’s each having about 40%, and Fitch having about 15%1

The history of the “Big Three” dates back to the early 20th century, when the first rating agencies emerged to provide information and analysis to investors and lenders. S&P was founded in 1860 by Henry Varnum Poor, a financial journalist who published books on the history and operations of American railroads. In 1906, it merged with the Standard Statistics Bureau, a provider of financial statistics. Moody’s was founded in 1909 by John Moody, a former Wall Street analyst who published ratings on railroad bonds. Fitch was founded in 1913 by John Knowles Fitch, a former editor of the Financial Review, who introduced the AAA-to-D rating scale2

The “Big Three” gained prominence and recognition in the following decades, as they expanded their coverage to other sectors and regions, and as they became regulated by the U.S. government. In 1975, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) designated them as the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs), meaning that they were used by the U.S. government for various regulatory purposes, such as setting capital requirements for banks and insurance companies. This gave them a competitive advantage and a quasi-official status in the financial markets3

The “Big Three” also faced criticism and controversy, especially after the 2007-2008 global financial crisis, when they were accused of giving inflated and inaccurate ratings to risky and complex securities, such as mortgage-backed securities, that contributed to the collapse of the U.S. housing market and the subsequent recession. The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, a U.S. government-appointed panel, called them “key enablers of the financial meltdown” and “essential cogs in the wheel of financial destruction”4 The “Big Three” were also criticized for having conflicts of interest, as they were paid by the issuers of the securities they rated, and for having a lack of transparency, accountability, and competition.

The “Big Three” have since implemented reforms and improvements to address some of the issues raised by the crisis, such as enhancing their methodologies, governance, and disclosure practices. They have also faced more regulation and oversight from the U.S. and other countries, as well as more competition from new and emerging rating agencies, such as Morningstar, DBRS, and China’s Dagong. However, the “Big Three” still remain dominant and influential in the global rating industry, as they are widely used and trusted by investors, issuers, and regulators.

The “Big Three” credit rating agencies are not perfect, but they are essential players in the financial markets. They provide valuable information and opinions that help assess the credit risk and financial health of various entities. They also have a significant impact on the cost and availability of capital, and on the stability and growth of the global economy. As such, they deserve our attention and scrutiny, as well as our respect and appreciation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Millionaire Next Door: The Surprising Secrets of America's Wealthy

 "The Millionaire Next Door" is a must-read for anyone looking to understand the true nature of wealth and success. The book takes a deep dive into the habits and characteristics of America's wealthiest individuals, and what sets them apart from those who struggle to make ends meet. One of the biggest takeaways from the book is that wealth is not necessarily correlated with a high income. Instead, it's often a result of consistent savings, frugal spending habits, and smart investments. The authors bust several popular myths about the wealthy, including the idea that they all inherit their money or that they live extravagant lifestyles. I found the book to be incredibly eye-opening, and it has forever changed the way I think about money. I was particularly impressed with the level of research and data analysis that went into the book. The authors surveyed and studied thousands of individuals, and their findings are presented in a clear and easy-to-understand manner. On...
Post a Comment
Read more

How Collusion Affects the Economy: A Guide for Savvy Consumers

To Collude, or Not to Collude: The Economics Behind Collusion Explained Collusion is a term that often has negative connotations in the business world. It refers to a secret or illegal agreement between two or more firms to coordinate their actions in order to gain an unfair advantage over their competitors. Collusion can take many forms, such as fixing prices, dividing markets, limiting output, or sharing confidential information. Collusion can also occur at different levels of the supply chain, such as between suppliers and retailers, or between buyers and sellers. But why do firms collude in the first place? And what are the consequences of collusion for consumers, producers, and society as a whole? In this blog post, we will explore the economics behind collusion and its pros and cons. The Incentive to Collude The main reason why firms collude is to increase their profits by reducing competition and increasing their market power. By colluding, firms can act as if they were a monopo...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Avoid the Correlation-Causation Fallacy in Finance: A Quick Guide

  # Correlation Does Not Imply Causation: A One Minute Perspective on Correlation vs. Causation If you are interested in finance, you have probably encountered many graphs, charts, and statistics that show the relationship between two variables. For example, you might see a graph that shows how the stock market performance is correlated with the unemployment rate, or how the inflation rate is correlated with the consumer price index. But what do these correlations mean? And can we use them to make predictions or draw conclusions about the causes of financial phenomena? ## What is correlation? Correlation is a measure of how closely two variables move together. It ranges from -1 to 1, where -1 means that the variables move in opposite directions, 0 means that there is no relationship, and 1 means that the variables move in the same direction. For example, if the correlation between the stock market and the unemployment rate is -0.8, it means that when the stock market goes up, the u...
Post a Comment
Read more