Skip to main content

How to Survive the Market’s Irrationality: A Guide for Savvy Investors



Why the Market Can Remain Irrational Longer Than You Can Stay Solvent

Have you ever wondered why the market sometimes behaves in ways that seem to defy logic and common sense? Why do some stocks soar to absurd heights, while others plummet to the ground, regardless of their underlying fundamentals? Why do investors flock to buy overvalued assets, while ignoring undervalued ones? Why do bubbles form and burst, leaving behind a trail of financial ruin and misery?

These are some of the questions that perplex many investors, especially those who follow the principles of value investing. Value investing is a strategy that involves buying stocks that are trading below their intrinsic value, based on their earnings, assets, dividends, and growth potential. Value investors believe that the market is not always efficient, and that it often misprices securities due to irrational factors, such as emotions, biases, herd mentality, and speculation. Value investors aim to exploit these market inefficiencies by buying low and selling high, thus earning a profit in the long run.

However, value investing is not without its challenges and risks. One of the most famous quotes attributed to John Maynard Keynes, the influential economist and investor, is: “The market can remain irrational longer than you can stay solvent.” This quote captures the essence of one of the biggest pitfalls of value investing: timing. Even if you are right about the intrinsic value of a stock, you may have to wait a long time before the market recognizes it and adjusts the price accordingly. In the meantime, you may face significant losses, margin calls, opportunity costs, and psychological stress. You may also run out of cash or patience before the market corrects itself.

This is what happened to many value investors during the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s and early 2000s. The dot-com bubble was a period of extreme optimism and speculation in the technology sector, fueled by the emergence of the internet and e-commerce. Many internet companies with little or no earnings, revenues, or profits saw their stock prices skyrocket to astronomical levels, while many established companies with solid fundamentals saw their stock prices stagnate or decline. Many value investors who avoided or shorted the dot-com stocks suffered huge losses, while many momentum investors who followed the trend made huge gains. Some value investors even went bankrupt or gave up on investing altogether.

One of the most prominent examples of a value investor who suffered during the dot-com bubble was Warren Buffett, the legendary chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway. Buffett is widely regarded as one of the most successful investors of all time, with a net worth of over $100 billion as of April 20211. However, during the dot-com bubble, Buffett was widely criticized and ridiculed for his refusal to invest in internet stocks. He famously said: "I don’t understand this technology stuff. We’re not going to play in a game where we don’t know the rules."2 As a result, Berkshire Hathaway’s stock price underperformed the S&P 500 index by more than 20 percentage points in 19993. Many investors questioned Buffett’s competence and relevance in the new economy.

However, Buffett was eventually vindicated when the dot-com bubble burst in 2000-2001. Many internet companies went bankrupt or lost more than 90% of their market value4, while Berkshire Hathaway’s stock price recovered and outperformed the S&P 500 index by more than 40 percentage points in 2000-20013. Buffett proved once again that his value investing philosophy was sound and profitable in the long run.

So, what can we learn from this episode? How can we avoid being caught in a similar situation in the future? Here are some possible takeaways:

  • Don’t invest in something you don’t understand. If you can’t explain what a company does, how it makes money, and what its competitive advantages are, you are better off staying away from it.
  • Don’t follow the crowd blindly. Just because everyone else is buying or selling something doesn’t mean you should too. Do your own research and analysis, and form your own opinions based on facts and logic.
  • Don’t let your emotions cloud your judgment. Fear and greed are powerful forces that can drive you to make irrational decisions. Be aware of your own biases and emotions, and try to overcome them with reason and discipline.
  • Don’t put all your eggs in one basket. Diversify your portfolio across different sectors, industries, geographies, and asset classes. This will reduce your exposure to any single risk factor and increase your chances of survival.
  • Don’t give up on your convictions. If you have done your homework and have a strong belief in your investment thesis, don’t let short-term fluctuations or negative feedback sway you from your course. Stick to your plan and be patient until the market recognizes your value.

The market can remain irrational longer than you can stay solvent. But if you follow these principles, you may be able to avoid being on the wrong side of the market, and reap the rewards of being a rational and prudent investor.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Trade Unions 101: What They Are, Why They Matter, and How They Wor

  The history of trade unions is a long and complex one, involving social, economic, and political factors. Here is a brief summary of some key events and developments: Trade unions originated in Great Britain, continental Europe, and the United States during the Industrial Revolution, when workers faced harsh and exploitative conditions in factories and mines 1 . Trade unions were initially illegal and persecuted by employers and governments, who used laws such as restraint-of-trade and conspiracy to suppress their activities 1 . Trade unions gradually gained legal recognition and protection through acts such as the Trade-Union Act of 1871 in Britain 1 and a series of court decisions in the United States 2 . Trade unions adopted different strategies and structures depending on the country, industry, and sector they operated in. Some examples are craft unions, general unions, and industrial unions 1 2 . Trade unions also developed political affiliations and influences, such as the...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Zero-Based Budgeting Method: How to Make Every Dollar Count

Hey friends! Are you tired of living paycheck to paycheck and never being able to save any money? It's a common problem, but there's a solution. Enter the zero-based budgeting method. Zero-based budgeting is a budgeting system where you start with zero dollars in your budget and then allocate every dollar to a specific category, whether it be savings, housing, or entertainment. The idea is that at the end of the month, your income minus your expenses should equal zero. Sounds simple, right? Well, the trick is sticking to it. But with a little discipline and effort, zero-based budgeting can be a game-changer for your finances. So, how do you get started with zero-based budgeting? Here's a step-by-step guide: Write down all of your monthly income, including your salary, any side hustle income, and any other sources of income. Write down all of your monthly expenses, including everything from rent and utilities to groceries and entertainment. Make sure to include all of your f...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Avoid Buying a Lemon: What George Akerlof Taught Us About Information Asymmetry and Market Failures

How the Market for Lemons Explains Why We Can’t Have Nice Things Have you ever wondered why it is so hard to find a good used car, or a reliable contractor, or a trustworthy insurance company? You might think that the market would reward the sellers of high-quality products and services, and weed out the low-quality ones. But sometimes, the opposite happens: the market becomes flooded with “lemons”, or defective goods, and the good ones disappear. This is what Nobel laureate George Akerlof called the “market for lemons” problem, and it has profound implications for many aspects of our economy and society. What is the market for lemons? The market for lemons is a situation where there is asymmetric information between buyers and sellers, meaning that one party has more or better information than the other. In particular, the seller knows more about the quality of the product or service than the buyer, and the buyer cannot easily verify it before making a purchase. This creates a problem...
Post a Comment
Read more