Skip to main content

Money and Happiness: How to Break Free from the Hedonic Treadmill, Avoid the Income-Happiness Paradox, and Embrace the Social Comparison Theory



Does Money Buy Happiness? Hedonic Treadmill, Income-Happiness Paradox and Social Comparison Theory

We all want to be happy, but how much does money contribute to our happiness? This is a question that has fascinated psychologists, economists, and philosophers for decades. In this blog post, we will explore some of the theories and findings that try to answer this question, such as the hedonic treadmill, the income-happiness paradox, and the social comparison theory.

The Hedonic Treadmill

The hedonic treadmill is a term coined by Brickman and Campbell in 1971, describing the tendency of people to keep a fairly stable baseline level of happiness despite external events and fluctuations in demographic circumstances1 The idea is that we adapt to changes in our life circumstances, both positive and negative, and return to our previous level of happiness over time. For example, if we win the lottery, we may experience a surge of happiness at first, but then we get used to our new wealth and take it for granted. Similarly, if we lose a limb in an accident, we may feel devastated at first, but then we cope with our loss and adjust to our new situation.

The hedonic treadmill suggests that money does not have a lasting impact on our happiness, because we always adjust our expectations and desires to match our income level. As a result, we are always chasing more money, thinking that it will make us happier, but we never reach a lasting state of satisfaction.

The Income-Happiness Paradox

The income-happiness paradox is a contradiction in the data that was first observed by Easterlin in 19742 He found that while happiness varies directly with income both among and within nations at a point in time, happiness does not increase when a country’s income increases over time. In other words, richer countries are not happier than poorer countries on average, and people in the same country are not happier as their income grows over time.

This paradox challenges the assumption that economic growth leads to greater well-being for everyone. It also implies that there is a limit to how much money can buy happiness, and that other factors, such as social relationships, health, education, and culture, may play a more important role in determining our happiness.

The Social Comparison Theory

The social comparison theory was first proposed by Festinger in 1954, and states that people have a basic drive to evaluate their opinions and abilities by comparing themselves to others3 We do this to gain accurate self-evaluations and to learn how to define ourselves. However, social comparison can also affect our happiness, depending on who we compare ourselves to and how we perceive the comparison.

There are two types of social comparison: upward and downward. Upward social comparison occurs when we compare ourselves to those who we believe are better than us. This can motivate us to improve ourselves and achieve more, but it can also make us feel inferior and dissatisfied with ourselves. Downward social comparison occurs when we compare ourselves to those who are worse off than us. This can boost our self-esteem and make us feel grateful for what we have, but it can also make us complacent and less empathetic.

Social comparison theory suggests that money can influence our happiness depending on how we use it as a standard of comparison. If we compare ourselves to those who have more money than us, we may feel unhappy and envious. If we compare ourselves to those who have less money than us, we may feel happy and generous. However, these effects are not stable or universal, as they depend on our personal values, goals, and expectations.

Conclusion

Money is often considered as a means to achieve happiness, but the relationship between money and happiness is not simple or straightforward. As we have seen, there are different theories and findings that try to explain how money affects our happiness, such as the hedonic treadmill, the income-happiness paradox, and the social comparison theory. These theories suggest that money can have both positive and negative effects on our happiness depending on how much we have, how we spend it, how we adapt to it, and how we compare ourselves to others.

However, money is not the only factor that influences our happiness. There are many other aspects of life that contribute to our well-being, such as health, relationships, meaning, purpose, autonomy, creativity, spirituality, etc. Therefore, instead of focusing solely on money as a source of happiness, we should also pay attention to these other dimensions of life that can enrich our experience and make us happier.

References

1: Brickman P., Campbell D.T., Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In: Appley M.H., editor. Adaptation-level theory: A symposium. Academic Press; New York: 1971. pp. 287–302. 2: Easterlin R.A., Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In: David P.A., Reder M.W., editors. Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz. Academic Press; New York: 1974. pp. 89–125. 3: Festinger L., A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations. 1954;7:117–140.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Trade Unions 101: What They Are, Why They Matter, and How They Wor

  The history of trade unions is a long and complex one, involving social, economic, and political factors. Here is a brief summary of some key events and developments: Trade unions originated in Great Britain, continental Europe, and the United States during the Industrial Revolution, when workers faced harsh and exploitative conditions in factories and mines 1 . Trade unions were initially illegal and persecuted by employers and governments, who used laws such as restraint-of-trade and conspiracy to suppress their activities 1 . Trade unions gradually gained legal recognition and protection through acts such as the Trade-Union Act of 1871 in Britain 1 and a series of court decisions in the United States 2 . Trade unions adopted different strategies and structures depending on the country, industry, and sector they operated in. Some examples are craft unions, general unions, and industrial unions 1 2 . Trade unions also developed political affiliations and influences, such as the...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Zero-Based Budgeting Method: How to Make Every Dollar Count

Hey friends! Are you tired of living paycheck to paycheck and never being able to save any money? It's a common problem, but there's a solution. Enter the zero-based budgeting method. Zero-based budgeting is a budgeting system where you start with zero dollars in your budget and then allocate every dollar to a specific category, whether it be savings, housing, or entertainment. The idea is that at the end of the month, your income minus your expenses should equal zero. Sounds simple, right? Well, the trick is sticking to it. But with a little discipline and effort, zero-based budgeting can be a game-changer for your finances. So, how do you get started with zero-based budgeting? Here's a step-by-step guide: Write down all of your monthly income, including your salary, any side hustle income, and any other sources of income. Write down all of your monthly expenses, including everything from rent and utilities to groceries and entertainment. Make sure to include all of your f...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Avoid Buying a Lemon: What George Akerlof Taught Us About Information Asymmetry and Market Failures

How the Market for Lemons Explains Why We Can’t Have Nice Things Have you ever wondered why it is so hard to find a good used car, or a reliable contractor, or a trustworthy insurance company? You might think that the market would reward the sellers of high-quality products and services, and weed out the low-quality ones. But sometimes, the opposite happens: the market becomes flooded with “lemons”, or defective goods, and the good ones disappear. This is what Nobel laureate George Akerlof called the “market for lemons” problem, and it has profound implications for many aspects of our economy and society. What is the market for lemons? The market for lemons is a situation where there is asymmetric information between buyers and sellers, meaning that one party has more or better information than the other. In particular, the seller knows more about the quality of the product or service than the buyer, and the buyer cannot easily verify it before making a purchase. This creates a problem...
Post a Comment
Read more